# SMT RAJ KUMARI BANSAL & ANR. vs SH GURCHARAN SINGH OTHERS

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-02-19
Citation: RC.REV.-63/2021 2025:DHC:1822
Petitioner: SMT RAJ KUMARI BANSAL & ANR.
Respondent: SH GURCHARAN SINGH OTHERS

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/59019022025RCR632021_173425.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 19.02.2025 RC.REV. 63/2021 & CM Appls.10953/2021 and 9873/2024 SMT RAJ KUMARI BANSAL & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajat Aneja, Mr. Prabhat Ranjan and Mr. Jatin Tyagi, Advs. versus SH GURCHARAN SINGH OTHERS .....Respondents Through: Mr. J.K. Bhola, Mr. Mohit Mittal, Ms. Muskan Bhola and Mr. Siddhant Saraswat, Advs. for R-6 to 8 CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral) 1. The present Petition has been filed on behalf of the Petitioners/landlords impugning the order dated 16.02.2021 [hereinafter after referred to as “Impugned Order”] passed by the learned CCJ-cum-ARC (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi with respect to the premises i.e., property no. 13, Church Mission Road, Fatehpuri, Chandni Chowk, Delhi-110006 [hereinafter referred to as “subject premises”]. By the Impugned Order, the leave to defend Application filed by the Respondents/tenants has been allowed in view of the triable issues raised by the Respondents/tenants. 2. The record reflects that by an order dated 19.02.2024 a Coordinate 3. Learned Counsel for the Petitioners/landlords submits that the Impugned Order has been 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/february/smt-raj-kumari-bansal-anr-vs-sh-gurcharan-singh-others