# SHANTARAM SAKHARAM GHADI (SINCE DECD THROUGH LRS) vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

Court: Bombay High Court
Date: 2025-02-06
Citation: WP/13413/2017
Petitioner: SHANTARAM SAKHARAM GHADI (SINCE DECD THROUGH LRS)
Respondent: THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

[Official PDF on Bombay High Court website](https://bombayhighcourt.gov.in/bhc/file/download/eyJpdiI6ImNrOFFXelBheHNSSzdtbVN2a1hWd0E9PSIsInZhbHVlIjoiN010cFFHT004OGZvNEtyaytlUTIraVVGam53UmNXdFcxZzNITUUzN0FYQ0I1UnNCSythWlNxbGxTMjZKV2w3ZGVSaEtEY2s5bWhMRFgvTEhiWlRhY1E9PSIsIm1hYyI6IjU0MjkyZjc0M2JhYjRmNzFkZTAwM2UxNTM3NWFjYjJjZDEwNmU1MzA4OTgzYmMxYzc1MTg2MDc1MDc2Yjk3YWIiLCJ0YWciOiIifQ==?expires=1782777617&signature=4fc7b9bf31fd9552f21cc43067926e44468c73668a9c83ec0ce900db15b2b6b7)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

apn 8-aswp-13413-2017-J.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.13413 OF 2017 1. Shantaram Sakharam Ghadi, ] (Since deceased through his legal heir) ] 1A. Smt. Anita Shantaram Ghadi, ] Age: 58 years, Occ.: Household ] Residing at Property No.821, ] Behind Sharneshwar Mandir, ] Panvel Tapal Naka, Panvel ] District Raigad. 2. Madhukar Baburao Jagnade, ] Age: 65 years, Occ.: Business ] 3. Vasant Sakharam Ghadi, ] Age: 65 years, Occ.: Business ] 4. Parvtibai Dagadu Angre, ] (Since deceased through her legal heir) ] 4A. Suresh Dagadu Angre, ] Age: 58 years, Occ.: Business ] 5. Ramesh Gajanan Aarte, ] (Since deceased through his legal heir) ] 5A. Kavita Ramesh Aarte, ] Age: 29 years, Occ.: Business ] Nos.2 to 5 are Shop at Property No.821, ] Behind Sharneshwar Mandir, ] Panvel Tapal Naka, Panvel ] District Raigad. ] … Petitioners V/s. ASHWINI H GAJAKOSH 1. The State of Maharashtra, ] 2. Panvel Municipal Corporation ] Through Commissioner, ] Taluka Panvel, District Raigad ] 3. Ranchodji Devosthan Trust, ] Through the Chief Trustee ] Mr. Mahendra Yashwant Phake, ] Adult Indian Inhabitant ] Residing at House No.1679, ] Takkagaon, Panvel ] 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/february/shantaram-sakharam-ghadi-since-decd-through-lrs-vs-the-state-of-maharashtra-and-ors