# SACHIN NAGPAL vs GOPAL KRISHAN

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-02-12
Citation: RC.REV.-326/2024 2025:DHC:1449
Petitioner: SACHIN NAGPAL
Respondent: GOPAL KRISHAN

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/59012022025RCR3262024_123022.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 12.02.2025 RC.REV. 326/2024 & CM APPL. 66207/2024 SACHIN NAGPAL .....Petitioner Through: Vikas Khatri, Mr. Manas Khatri, Ms. Khushboo Pathak & Ms. Seema Khatri, Advocates. versus GOPAL KRISHAN .....Respondent Through: Mr. Kunal Kher, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral) 1. The present Petition has been filed by the Petitioner/tenant seeking to challenge the order dated 25.09.2024 passed by the learned CCJ cum ARC (Central) Tis Hazari Courts, New Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “Impugned Order”]. By the Impugned Order, the Leave to Defend/Contest Application filed by the Petitioner/tenant has been dismissed. The premises in issue is a private Shop No.11, situated at First Floor of Property bearing No. 413, Gali Rajan Kalan, Kashmere Gate, Delhi-110006 [hereinafter referred to as the “subject premises”]. 2. This Court had examined the Impugned Order on the last date of hearing as well as today. 3. The Petitioner/tenant had, on the previous date, raised the same contention that he has raised today. It is stated by the learned Counsel for the 4. Learned Counsel for the Petition

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/february/sachin-nagpal-vs-gopal-krishan