# SA/509/2003 of GUDURI LAXMIRAJAM Vs GUDURI BAL RAJU KUMAR

Court: High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Date: 2025-02-18
Citation: APHC010158872003
Petitioner: SA/509/2003 of GUDURI LAXMIRAJAM
Respondent: GUDURI BAL RAJU KUMAR

[Official PDF on High Court of Andhra Pradesh website](https://indian-high-court-judgments.s3.ap-south-1.amazonaws.com/data/pdf/year=2025/court=28_2/bench=aphc/APHC010158872003_1_2025-02-19.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

APHC010158872003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3369] (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY ,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 509/2003 Between: Guduri Laxmirajam ...APPELLANT AND Guduri Bal Raju Kumar ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: 1. P V NARAYANA RAO Counsel for the Respondent: 1. M RAJAMALLA REDDY 2. K SITA RAM The Court made the following JUDGMENT: 1. This Second Appeal was filed by the appellant/plaintiff under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, 'C.P.C.') against the Judgment and decree, dated 02.01.2003 passed in A.S.No.133 of 2000 on the file of learned Senior Civil Judge, Allagadda, confirming the judgment and decree, dated 14.07.2000 passed in O.S.No.66 of 1995 on the file of learned Junior Civil Judge, Allagadda. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing in the morning session, no representation on behalf of either side. The matter was subsequently passed over at 2.15 P.M. 3. In the post lunch session also, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant despite listing the matter under the caption ‘fo

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/february/sa-509-2003-of-guduri-laxmirajam-vs-guduri-bal-raju-kumar