# MUSARRAT ALI vs TASNEEM JAHAN

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-02-10
Citation: RC.REV.-616/2019 2025:DHC:1155
Petitioner: MUSARRAT ALI
Respondent: TASNEEM JAHAN

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/59010022025RCR6162019_145827.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 10.02.2025 RC.REV. 616/2019 & CM APPL. 47593/2019 MUSARRAT ALI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vinay, Advocate. versus TASNEEM JAHAN .....Respondent Through: Mr. Diwan Singh Chauhan, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral) 1. The present Petition has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner/tenant seeking to challenge an order dated 26.04.2019 [hereinafter referred to as the “Impugned Order”] passed by learned Additional Rent Controller (Central) Tis Hazari Court, Delhi. By the Impugned Order, the Leave to Defend/Contest Application filed by the Petitioner/tenant has been dismissed and the Respondent/landlady has been found entitled to possession of the premises i.e., Shop bearing municipal No.1435-A, admeasuring 3.5 x 10 sq. ft., Ward No. IX, situated at Bazar Chitli Qabar, Jama Masjid, Delhi-110006, as shown in green colour in the site plan annexed with the Eviction Petition [hereinafter referred to as the “subject premises”]. 2. A Coordinate Bench of this Court by an order dated 18.11.2019 3. The only contention that is raised by the Petitioner/tenant is that the subject premises 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/february/musarrat-ali-vs-tasneem-jahan