# MANASH LIFESTYLE PRIVATE LIMITED vs SHABINA KUNDIAL & ANR.

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-02-14
Citation: C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM)-88/2024 2025:DHC:1012
Petitioner: MANASH LIFESTYLE PRIVATE LIMITED
Respondent: SHABINA KUNDIAL & ANR.

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/ABL14022025COT882024_175503.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 14th February, 2025 + C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 88/2024 & I.A. 33225/2024 MANASH LIFESTYLE PRIVATE LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Mr. Nageshwar Kumhar, Advocates. versus SHABINA KUNDIAL & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Nidhi Raman, CGSC with Mr. Arnav Mittal & Mr. Zubin Singh, Advocates for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL AMIT BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1. The present rectification petition has been filed under Section 57 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (hereinafter ‘the Act’) seeking rectification/ removal of the trade mark ‘ ’ bearing application no. 4686526 in class 44 in the name of the respondent no.1 (hereinafter ‘impugned mark’) from the Register of Trade Marks. PROCEEDINGS IN THE PETITION 2. Notice in the present petition was issued to the respondents on 15th July, 2024. 3. Despite service, neither any appearance has been made on behalf of 4. None appears on behalf of the respondent no.1 even today. BRIEF FACTS 5. Brief facts set up in the petition, which are relevant for adjudicating the present petition, are as under: 5.1. The petitioner, Manash Lifestyle Private Limited, was incorporated in the

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/february/manash-lifestyle-private-limited-vs-shabina-kundial-anr