# LT. COL. MANSI GAUTAM vs UNION OF INDIA

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-02-20
Citation: W.P.(C)-2250/2025 2025:DHC:1128-DB
Petitioner: LT. COL. MANSI GAUTAM
Respondent: UNION OF INDIA

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/NAC20022025CW22502025_114818.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 20.02.2025 W.P.(C) 2250/2025 LT. COL. MANSI GAUTAM .....Petitioner Through: Mr.Rakesh Kumar, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA .....Respondent Through: Mr.Sushil Kumar Pandey, SPC with Mr.Vedansh Anand, GP, Mr.Hemant Mishra, Ms.Richa Pandey and Ms.Neha Yadav, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SHALINDER KAUR NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (ORAL) CM APPL. 10623/2025 (Exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CM APPL. 10624/2025 2. This is an application seeking permission to file lengthy synopsis and list of dates. 3. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. 4. The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 2250/2025 & CM APPL. 10625/2025 5. This petition has been filed by the petitioner, challenging the 6. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner’s claim for consideration for a permanent commission is covered by the Judgment of the Supreme Court in Lt. Col. Suprita Chandel v. Union of India, 2024 SCC OnLine SC 3664. He submits that this aspect has not been considered by the learned Tribunal while passing the Impugned Order. 7. On the other hand, the learned cou

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/february/lt-col-mansi-gautam-vs-union-of-india