# HANUMAN JAIRAM NAIK vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR AND ORS

Court: Bombay High Court
Date: 2025-02-25
Citation: WP/362/2025
Petitioner: HANUMAN JAIRAM NAIK
Respondent: THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR AND ORS

[Official PDF on Bombay High Court website](https://bombayhighcourt.gov.in/bhc/file/download/eyJpdiI6IkUvTnl1Z1p2b2JQYnNOZkN0R1ZHUVE9PSIsInZhbHVlIjoic2VrR0JFdnhtSURIN2tmWnhEdEhmRVhIYkJuZ2JxYkZaR0hFL0FmNCtvOC9KZVgrL0Vtd01oVzFjTjJ4Umo0cmV3b0FOOUU2clhodWdlK0U2d3lDcEE9PSIsIm1hYyI6IjA3ZjM2OTg5YzBmNjkzODMwYmY1Mzk5ZGJlNTgyMjYyYWUyOGI4ZDEwOGE3ZjJjZDE3NmEzYjk4NGNkOGVhNzYiLCJ0YWciOiIifQ==?expires=1782777490&signature=92e4b7353243dfe9d1749771daac8de729eb9385572f784fdd0e655c9e1d0773)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

21-aswp-362-2025-Jf.doc apn IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.362 OF 2025 Hanuman Jairam Naik ] Age: 54 Years, Occupation: Service ] Residing At: House No.340, ] Darave Village, Unit No.1, ] Ward – Belapur, Navi Mumbai, ] Taluka and District Thane. ] ...Petitioner V/s. 1. The State of Maharashtra ] 2. The Controller of Unauthorised ] Construction (U) CIDCO Ltd ] Having office at: Raigad Bhavan, ] Second Floor, CBD Belapur, ] Navi Mumbai 400 614. ] 3. Venu Nayar ] (Officer of Respondent No.2) ] Age: About 50 Years, ] Occupation: Service, ] Having Office At: Raigad Bhavan, ] Second Floor, CBD Belapur, ] Navi Mumbai, 400 614. ] 4. The Assistant Commissioner of ] Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation. ] Having Office At: A Ward, ] Navi Mumbai Municipal Corporation ] (Belapur Node), Navi Mumbai. ] ...Respondents ______________________________________ Mr. Tapan Thatte for the Petitioner. Mr. Shahaji Shinde, ‘B’ Panel, a/w Ms. Snehal Jadhav, AGP for the Respondent-State. 2025. PRONOUNCED ON : 25th February, 2025. JUDGMENT (Per Kamal Khata, J) : 1) By this Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner seeks the fol

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/february/hanuman-jairam-naik-vs-the-state-of-maharashtra-thr-and-ors