# GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. vs INDER JIT DUA

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-02-24
Citation: W.P.(C)-2339/2025 2025:DHC:1245-DB
Petitioner: GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS.
Respondent: INDER JIT DUA

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/CHS24022025CW23392025_194001.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

$~64, 65 & 67 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI W.P.(C) 2339/2025, CM APPL. 11024/2025 & CM APPL. 11025/2025 GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Gaurav Dhingra, Mr. Shashank Singh, Advs. versus INDER JIT DUA .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sourabh Ahuja, Adv. W.P.(C) 2340/2025, CM APPL. 11026/2025 & CM APPL. 11027/2025 GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI, & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Gaurav Dhingra, Mr. Shashank Singh, Advs. versus SATISH BIHARI MATHUR .....Respondent Through: W.P.(C) 2347/2025, CM APPL. 11144/2025 & CM APPL. 11145/2025 GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Gaurav Dhingra, Mr. Shashank Singh, Advs. versus ASHOK KUMAR DUA .....Respondent Through: W.P.(C) 2339/2025 and other connected matters 1. These writ petitions emanate from a judgment dated 19 February 2024 passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal 1 in three original applications. The Tribunal has treated OA 3058/2016, filed by Satish Bihari Mathur, the respondent in WP (C) 2340/2025, as the lead case. We also, therefore, would be referring to the facts apropos Satish Bihari Mathur. 2. The reference to the “respondent” would, therefore, be a reference to S

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/february/government-of-nct-of-delhi-ors-vs-inder-jit-dua