# CRP/556/2022 of Mohd. Bash Vs Varadi Appa Rao

Court: High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Date: 2025-02-17
Citation: APHC010122002022
Petitioner: CRP/556/2022 of Mohd. Bash
Respondent: Varadi Appa Rao

[Official PDF on High Court of Andhra Pradesh website](https://indian-high-court-judgments.s3.ap-south-1.amazonaws.com/data/pdf/year=2025/court=28_2/bench=aphc/APHC010122002022_1_2025-02-18.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

APHC010122002022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3460] (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 556/2022 Between: Mohd. Bash ...PETITIONER AND Varadi Appa Rao and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K.V.S.S.PRABHAKARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. A RAVEENDRA BABU 2. The Court made the following: 2 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.556 of 2022 ORDER: 1. The present Civil Revision Petition is filed questioning the Order dated 25.02.2022 in I.A.No.129 of 2021 in RCA.No.5 of 2018 passed by the Appellate Authority under A.P. Building (Lease, Rent and Eviction) Control-cum-Senior Civil Judge, Rajamahendravaram, East Godavari District. 2. As per the information furnished by the District Judiciary vide Letter in Dis.No.1197, dated 05.02.2025, the RCA.No.5 of 2018 was dismissed on 05.09.2022. In view of the same, no orders are required to be passed in the C.R.P. 3. Therefore, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a se

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/february/crp-556-2022-of-mohd-bash-vs-varadi-appa-rao