# CRLP/3916/2021 of THATINENI SWAROOPA RANI Vs STATE OF AP

Court: High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Date: 2025-02-24
Citation: APHC010242822021
Petitioner: CRLP/3916/2021 of THATINENI SWAROOPA RANI
Respondent: STATE OF AP

[Official PDF on High Court of Andhra Pradesh website](https://indian-high-court-judgments.s3.ap-south-1.amazonaws.com/data/pdf/year=2025/court=28_2/bench=aphc/APHC010242822021_1_2025-02-25.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

APHC010242822021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3333] (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY ,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 3916/2021 Between: Thatineni Swaroopa Rani and Others ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND State Of Ap and Others ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. P NAGENDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following: ORDER: This Criminal Petition is filed seeking to quash the proceedings in FIR.No.308 of 2021 on the file of the Penamaluru Police Station, Vijayawada City. 2. Today when the petition is taken up for hearing, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor has produced a copy of instructions dated 24.02.2025, issued by the Sub-Inspector of Police, Penamaluru Police Station, Krishna District, wherein it is stated that pending the present petition, the Police, after due investigation referred the case as “Undetectable” vide C.No.831/SDPO/GVRM/2022, dated 31.10.2022. 3. In view of the fact that on 31.10.2022, as the case was referred as undetectable by the investigating 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/february/crlp-3916-2021-of-thatineni-swaroopa-rani-vs-state-of-ap