# CMA/396/2009 of KUMMITHA NARAYANAMMA Vs KUMMITHA CHENNA REDDY

Court: High Court of Andhra Pradesh
Date: 2025-02-18
Citation: APHC010237932009
Petitioner: CMA/396/2009 of KUMMITHA NARAYANAMMA
Respondent: KUMMITHA CHENNA REDDY

[Official PDF on High Court of Andhra Pradesh website](https://indian-high-court-judgments.s3.ap-south-1.amazonaws.com/data/pdf/year=2025/court=28_2/bench=aphc/APHC010237932009_1_2025-02-19.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

APHC010237932009 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI [3509] (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY ,THE NINETEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 396/2009 Between: Kummitha Narayanamma ...APPELLANT AND Kummitha Chenna Reddy ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: 1. G V L MURHTY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. KOTI REDDY IDAMAKANTI The Court made the following: RNT, J & CGR, J 2 CMA No. 396 of 2009 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI & THE HON’BL SRI JUSTICE CHALLA GUNARANJAN CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL No. 396 of 2009 JUDGMENT: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Challa Gunaranjan) The present appeal is preferred by the appellant/wife aggrieved by the Order in H.M.O.P.No.706 of 2007 on the file of the learned Senior Civil Judge, Darsi, by which, the petitioner filed by the respondent/husband under Section 13 (1) (ib) of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 for dissolution of marriage, came to be allowed. 2. There is no interim order passed in the present appeal. 3. None appears either for the appellant or the respondent. 4. The Civil Miscella

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/february/cma-396-2009-of-kummitha-narayanamma-vs-kummitha-chenna-reddy