# AMARCHAND vs RAKESH KUMAR

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-02-12
Citation: RC.REV.-191/2017 2025:DHC:1377
Petitioner: AMARCHAND
Respondent: RAKESH KUMAR

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/59012022025RCR1912017_125105.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 12.02.2025 RC.REV. 191/2017, CM APPL. 15344/2017, CM APPL. 15345/2017, CM APPL. 8948/2018 AMARCHAND .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sourabh Gupta, Mr. Puneet Yadav, Ms. Priya Mittal, Advs. versus RAKESH KUMAR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shekhar N., Adv. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral) 1. The present Petition has been filed by the Petitioner/tenant impugning an order dated 23.12.2017 passed by Ld. Rent Controller, Dwarka District Court, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as ‘Impugned Order’]. By the Impugned Order, the Eviction Petition of the Respondent/landlord was allowed after a complete trial was conducted in the matter. The premises in issue is one built- up shop bearing No.835/1 ground floor with underneath and without roof right, admeasuring 10.0332 sq. mtrs. Of Municipal Corporation of Delhi forming part of property no.835, Haibat Pura, Som Bazar, Najafgarh, New Delhi [hereinafter referred to as ‘subject premises’]. 2. Learned Counsel for the Petitioner/tenant has raised one primary contention before this Court. Learned Counsel submits that the 11. Thus, it is the case of the Pe

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/february/amarchand-vs-rakesh-kumar