# ALOK RAI vs DDA AND ANR

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-02-24
Citation: W.P.(C)-12118/2023 2025:DHC:1242
Petitioner: ALOK RAI
Respondent: DDA AND ANR

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/60924022025CW121182023_194627.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 24th February, 2025 W.P.(C) 12118/2023 & CM APPL. 11037/2025 ALOK RAI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Romil Pathak, Advocate. versus DDA AND ANR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Tushar Sannu, Advocate for DDA. Mr. Dharmendra Kumar with Mr. Shashi Bhushan, Advocates for R-2. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioner seeks early hearing of the matter. 2. The matter is fixed for tomorrow and it is not comprehensible as to why this application has been moved at such a belated stage. 3. Be that as it may, since the learned counsel for respondents are also present and the learned counsel for petitioner has joined the proceedings through video conferencing, the date is pre-poned and the writ petition is taken up for hearing, today itself. 4. Petitioner is resident of Type-D, Block-4 of the Society namely, Nav Sansad Vihar, CGHS Ltd., New Delhi. He is occupying Flat No. 424. 5. The present matter relates to unauthorized extension of balcony. 6. DDA had issued a notice under Section 31 of Delhi Development Act, 1957 on 11.08.2021 thereby asking to stop construction in respect of the above said flat. 7. Such 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/february/alok-rai-vs-dda-and-anr