# WRIT - A No. 18861 of 2025 at Allahabad

Court: Allahabad High Court
Date: 2025-12-15
Citation: WRIT - A No. 18861 of 2025 at Allahabad
Petitioner: WRIT - A No. 18861 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent: Unknown

[Official PDF on Allahabad High Court website](https://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebDownloadOriginalHCJudgmentDocument.do?translatedJudgmentID=83183)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 18861 of 2025 Devendra Singh .....Petitioner(s) Versus Union Of India And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Surendra Pratap Singh, Vaishno Poojan Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : A.S.G.I. Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Vaishno Poojan Yadav, learned counsel for the writ petitioner as well as Shri Vijay Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. Preliminary objection has been raised by the learned counsel for the respondents that the present petition may not be maintainable, particularly when the writ petitioner has alternate efficacious remedy to approach the Central Administrative Tribunal, as the order dated 28.07.2025 had been passed pursuant to an order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Allahabad Bench, Allahabad on 24.09.2021 in O.A. No.330/00245/2017. Reliance has been placed upon the decision of the Hon'ble Apex Court in L Chandrakumar vs. Union of India, AIR 1997 SC1125. 3. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner could not dispute the said legal position. 4. Accordingly, interference is declined. The writ petition stands disposed of leaving it open for t

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/december/writ-a-no-18861-of-2025-at-allahabad
