# WRIT - A No. 18611 of 2025 at Allahabad

Court: Allahabad High Court
Date: 2025-12-17
Citation: WRIT - A No. 18611 of 2025 at Allahabad
Petitioner: WRIT - A No. 18611 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent: Unknown

[Official PDF on Allahabad High Court website](https://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebDownloadOriginalHCJudgmentDocument.do?translatedJudgmentID=72212)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 18611 of 2025 Shivkumar Gupta .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Gunjan Sharma, Namit Kumar Sharma Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 34 HON'BLE VIKAS BUDHWAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Namit Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the writ petitioner and Sri Gaurav Singh, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The case of the writ petitioner is that the writ petitioner superannuated on 30.11.2019 as an Accountant, however, according to the writ petitioner, post his retirement now recovery has been sought to be made by virtue of the orders dated 18.11.2025, Annexure-1 at page-14 of the paper-book, 18.11.2025 at page-16, 18.11.2025 at page-18, 12.06.2025 at page-20 and 30.08.2025 at page-24 of the paper-book. 3. Learned counsel for the writ petitioner has sought to argue that post- retirement, the said recovery could not have been made and further the same is time-barred. 4. Learned Standing Counsel on the other hand submits that might be, the same are though titled as recovery, but they are in fact the show cause notice requiring the writ petitioner to submit hi

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/december/writ-a-no-18611-of-2025-at-allahabad