# SMT RUPA KUMARI JHA & ANR. vs TARUN KANT JHA

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-12-11
Citation: CRL.REV.P.(MAT.)-561/2025 2025:DHC:11249
Petitioner: SMT RUPA KUMARI JHA & ANR.
Respondent: TARUN KANT JHA

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/59511122025CRLRMAT5612025_194725.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 11th December, 2025 CRL.REV.P.(MAT.) 561/2025 SMT RUPA KUMARI JHA & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Shagun Mehta, Advocate. versus TARUN KANT JHA .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN AMIT MAHAJAN, J. (Oral) CRL.M.A. 37008/2025 (condonation of delay of 83 days in filing the present petition) & CRL.M.A. 37009/2025 (condonation of delay of about 28 days in re-filing the present petition) 1. For the reasons mentioned in the applications, the same are allowed and the delay in filing and re-filing the present petition is condoned. 2. The applications stand disposed of. CRL.REV.P.(MAT.) 561/2025 & CRL.M.A. 37085/2025 3. The present petition is filed against the order dated 25.04.2025 (hereafter ‘impugned order’) passed by the learned Family Court, West, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi in MT No. 457/2021. 4. By the impugned order, the learned Family Court directed the respondent to pay a sum of ₹10,000/- per month as interim 5. The learned Family Court considered the income affidavit of Petitioner No. 1 and noted that she had failed to disclose about her educational qualifications. It was noted that Pet

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/december/smt-rupa-kumari-jha-anr-vs-tarun-kant-jha