# SALOMI RAJENDRAN vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

Court: Bombay High Court
Date: 2025-12-05
Citation: APEAL/256/2021
Petitioner: SALOMI RAJENDRAN
Respondent: THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS.

[Official PDF on Bombay High Court website](https://bombayhighcourt.gov.in/bhc/file/download/eyJpdiI6IitBRGFkaXVBSVY0eE53WDkrMHVSTXc9PSIsInZhbHVlIjoic3Q1RW5zRFY1N215UXJuOFZoWEdtTjVpY1dNcnozeXpLYmlFb3g2Wkk5dW9JL2RhSXBrakoxL2d1bVU5R0hOMmkybVVFMnVMbHUzUHNDNDh3QXhtN1E9PSIsIm1hYyI6IjBiMmEwN2YzMGU1MTNjZDNlY2ZmZjc5N2UxYTQ0M2QwMmUxNzNlZGNkOGU1YjY2YTk3OWVlMzZiMjU2YTBmMTAiLCJ0YWciOiIifQ==?expires=1782773251&signature=c45ddbed07ec619889b5c44f5159e593133f1ca26279597432349217e2d6c9a2)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

Shubhada S Kadam 1-apeal No.261-2021 (two appeals).doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 261 of 2021 1 Christian Rajendran Aged 26 years, Occu.: Business 2 Joy Rajendran Aged 19 years., Occu.: Business Both residing at Chambharli, Tal. Khalapur, Dist. Raigad Appellants versus 1 The State of Maharashtra At the instance of Senior Inspector of Police Through Rasayani Police Station, Dist.Raigad. 2 A, Age : 20 years 3 B, Age : 18 years 4 C, Age ; 20 years 5 D, Age : 20 years 6 E, Age : 20 years 7 F, Age : 19 years 8 G, Age : 11 years 9 H, Age : 10 years All residents at Prerna Nav-Nihal Bal Ashram, Sector-5, Kharghar, Taluka ; Panvel, Dist: Raigad. Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 256 of 2021 1 Salomi Rajendran Aged 47 years., Occu.: Housewife, 2025. PRONOUNCED ON : 05th DECEMBER, 2025 Judgment : 1. By consent of both sides, both appeals since they involve same question of facts and law are heard and decided together by this common judgment. 2/37 Shubhada S Kadam 1-apeal No.261-2021 (two appeals).doc 2. These appeals take exception to the judgment and order dated 3rd March 2020 passed by Additional Sessions Judge, Panvel-R

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/december/salomi-rajendran-vs-the-state-of-maharashtra-and-ors