# RAJ KUMAR vs STATE GOVERNMENT OF NCT DELHI & ANR.

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-12-02
Citation: CRL.REV.P.-568/2023 2025:DHC:10804
Petitioner: RAJ KUMAR
Respondent: STATE GOVERNMENT OF NCT DELHI & ANR.

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/59502122025CRLR5682023_131605.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: December 02, 2025 CRL.REV.P. 568/2023 & CRL.M.A. 13650/2023 RAJ KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. B.K. Mishra and Mr. Tushar Mishra, Advs. versus STATE GOVERNMENT OF NCT DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, APP for the State Mr. I.N. Thakur, Adv. for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN AMIT MAHAJAN, J. (Oral) 1. The present petition has been filed under section 19(4) of the Family Courts Act 1984, read with Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, (‘Cr.P.C.’) seeking setting aside of the order dated 29.03.2023 (‘impugned order’), passed by the learned Family Court, in CC No. 276/ 2017, titled “Smt. Pragya Suman v. Sh. Raj Kumar”. 2. Vide the impugned order, the learned Family Court directed the Petitioner/ Husband to pay maintenance in the sum of Rs. 30,000/- per month to the Respondent No. 2/Wife. 3. The learned Counsel for the Petitioner submits that the 4. He further submits that the Respondent No. 2 is capable of earning and is more qualified that the Petitioner herein. 5. He further submits that the Respondent No. 2 is guilty of adultery and hence, was not entitl

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/december/raj-kumar-vs-state-government-of-nct-delhi-anr