# MUKESH KUMAR vs THE COMMISSIONER & ORS.

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-12-18
Citation: W.P.(C)-16179/2024 2025:DHC:11710-DB
Petitioner: MUKESH KUMAR
Respondent: THE COMMISSIONER & ORS.

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/NAC18122025CW161792024_181029.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 18.12.2025 W.P.(C) 16179/2024 MUKESH KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: In Person. versus THE COMMISSIONER & ORS. .....Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNEESH KUMAR GUPTA NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (ORAL) 1. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner, challenging the order dated 20.09.2022, passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Tribunal’), in O.A. No. 839/2022, titled Mukesh Kumar V. The Commissioner, MCD, And Ors., whereby the learned Tribunal allowed the O.A. filed by the petitioner herein, with the directions mentioned therein. 2. Despite service of notice, none has appeared on behalf of the respondents, and even the counter affidavit has not been filed, though an opportunity for the same was granted. 3. The limited issue that arises in the present petition is that the learned Tribunal, by its Impugned Order, has granted interest in favour of the petitioner only on the remaining amount of retiral benefits payable 4. The grievance of the petitioner is that since the payment of retiral benef

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/december/mukesh-kumar-vs-the-commissioner-ors