# ANIL KUMAR AKARNIA vs DIRECTOR GENERAL, INDO-TIBETAN BOARDER POLICE FORCE & ORS

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-12-10
Citation: W.P.(C)-7053/2016 2025:DHC:11243-DB
Petitioner: ANIL KUMAR AKARNIA
Respondent: DIRECTOR GENERAL, INDO-TIBETAN BOARDER POLICE FORCE & ORS

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/75810122025CW70532016_175939.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 10th December,2025 W.P.(C) 7053/2016 ANIL KUMAR AKARNIA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vipin Kumar Yadav and Mr. Krishna Srinivasan, Advs. versus DIRECTOR GENERAL, INDO-TIBETAN BORDER POLICE FORCE & ORS .....Respondents Through: Mr. Prasanta Varma, SCGC along with Mr. Rajat Choudhary, Ms. Richu, Advocates for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAV DINESH MEHTA, J. (ORAL) 1. By way of the present writ petition, the petitioner has challenged the adverse entry and degradation of his Annual Performance Appraisal Report (hereinafter referred to as “APAR”) by the Reviewing Authority from very good (7) to very bad (3.68). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner invited Court’s attention towards the APAR prepared by the Reporting Officer and highlighted that the Reporting Officer (Commandant 3rd Battalion ITBP, Bareilly, U.P) has given him numerical grading on the bases of weightage given in part four as 3.68 which means very bad. He further invited Court’s attention towards the following remarks made by the Reviewing Authority and submitted that the same is unfounded and untenable: “During th

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/december/anil-kumar-akarnia-vs-director-general-indo-tibetan-boarder-police-force-ors