# RAM KUMAR vs STATE OF NCT DELHI & ANR.

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-08-25
Citation: BAIL APPLN.-3234/2025 2025:DHC:7271
Petitioner: RAM KUMAR
Respondent: STATE OF NCT DELHI & ANR.

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/60825082025BA32342025_180440.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 25.08.2025 + BAIL APPLN. 3234/2025 & CRL.M.A. 25061/2025 RAM KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anilendra Pandey and Mr. Kamlesh Upadhyay, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State with SI Garima, PS Bawana CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The accused/applicant seeks anticipatory bail in case FIR No. 758/2023 of PS Bawana for offence under Section 354/506 IPC & Section 08 of POCSO Act. 2. Learned APP accepts notice and submits that it is not a fit case at all to grant anticipatory bail in view of the nature of allegations against the accused/applicant. 3. I have heard learned counsel for accused/applicant and learned APP, who has also shown me the investigation file containing statement under BAIL APPLN. 3234/2025 pages 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afe c45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, 4. Broadly speaking, the case set up by prosecution through the statement of 10 year old prosecutrix is that whenever she used to visit the grocery shop, the accused/applicant

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/august/ram-kumar-vs-state-of-nct-delhi-anr