# RAJIV GUJRAL vs SURENDER ARORA

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-08-08
Citation: CM(M)-1478/2025 2025:DHC:6765
Petitioner: RAJIV GUJRAL
Respondent: SURENDER ARORA

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/60908082025CMM14782025_131825.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 08th August, 2025 CM(M) 1478/2025 & CM APPL. 48775/2025 RAJIV GUJRAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rahul Madan, Advocate. versus SURENDER ARORA .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioner is defending a suit for possession, recovery of arrears of rent and damages. 2. According to plaintiff, three rooms were let out to the defendant by virtue of oral agreement. The suit has been resisted by the defendant and when he filed his written statement, in response to para 2 of the plaint, the defendant admitted that the tenancy as claimed in the plaint was created in the year 1985. 3. As already noticed above, according to the plaintiff, three rooms were let out to the defendant by virtue of oral agreement. 4. The defendant moved an application seeking amendment in the written statement and by virtue of the abovesaid written statement, he rather wants to project that there were “three separate and distinct tenancies which were created at different times i.e. in the year 1985, 1990 and 2004 respectively.” 5. Learned Trial Court has dismissed the abovesaid application, holdin

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/august/rajiv-gujral-vs-surender-arora