# PARMEET SINGH ANAND & ANR. vs SUBHASH CHAND AGGARWAL & ANR.

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-08-20
Citation: FAO(OS) (COMM)-128/2025 2025:DHC:7156-DB
Petitioner: PARMEET SINGH ANAND & ANR.
Respondent: SUBHASH CHAND AGGARWAL & ANR.

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/74820082025FAC1282025_183359.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 20th August 2025 + FAO(OS) (COMM) 128/2025 & CM APPL. 50251-50252/2025 PARMEET SINGH ANAND & ANR. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Ashish Dholakia, Sr. Adv. with Mr. Ashish Agarwal, Mr. Gurkamal Arora, Ms. Ramya Aggarwal, Ms. Ananya Narain Tyagi and Mr. Kushal Gupta, Advs. versus SUBHASH CHAND AGGARWAL & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Ashutosh Lohia, Ms. Shraddha Bhargava, Ms. Rishika Jain and Ms. Mansi Rose Taneja, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL JUDGMENT (ORAL) NITIN WASUDEO SAMBRE, J. 1. This present appeal has been filed by the plaintiffs/appellants against the judgement dated 06th August 2025 passed by the Ld. Single Bench of this Court in I.A.No.20016/2022, I.A.No.14311/2023 and CS (COMM) No.824/2022 titled as “Parmeet Singh Anand & Anr. v. Subhash Chand Aggarwal & Anr.” [hereinafter referred as “impugned judgement”] 2. The impugned judgement was passed in a suit for specific performance 3. Mr. Ashish Dholakia, Senior Counsel for plaintiffs/appellants urged that the observations in paragraphs 24 and 25 directing the SHO to conduct an inquiry are based on a complaint

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/august/parmeet-singh-anand-anr-vs-subhash-chand-aggarwal-anr-delhi-2