# DEEP AUTOMOBILES PVT. LTD. & ORS. vs VALO SERVICES

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-08-06
Citation: CM(M)-1181/2025 2025:DHC:6589
Petitioner: DEEP AUTOMOBILES PVT. LTD. & ORS.
Respondent: VALO SERVICES

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/60906082025CMM11812025_170806.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 06th August, 2025 CM(M) 1181/2025 & CM APPL. 39781-39782/2025 DEEP AUTOMOBILES PVT. LTD. & ORS. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Dilpreet Singh Gandhi, Ms. Srishti Prabhakar and Mr. Nishant Bishnoi, Advocates versus VALO SERVICES .....Respondent Through: Mr. Naushad Ahmed Khan and Ms. Archana Chaudhary, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Learned counsel for respondent appears pursuant to notice and submits that despite being duly served with the process, petitioners i.e. defendants did not bother to defend the matter in right earnest. 2. It is submitted that present endeavour is a belated one and, therefore, the present petition does not have any substance or merit. 3. However, during course of further arguments, learned counsel for respondent submits that the respondent (who is plaintiff before the learned Trial Court) does not want any further delay in the matter and, therefore, without prejudice to its rights and contentions, it would have no objection if the written statement, which has been submitted before the learned Trial Court, though belatedly, but within the permissible outer lim

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/august/deep-automobiles-pvt-ltd-ors-vs-valo-services