# CRIMINAL APPEAL U/S 372 CR.P.C. No. 117 of 2024 at Allahabad

Court: Allahabad High Court
Date: 2025-08-27
Citation: CRIMINAL APPEAL U/S 372 CR.P.C. No. 117 of 2024 at Allahabad
Petitioner: CRIMINAL APPEAL U/S 372 CR.P.C. No. 117 of 2024 at Allahabad
Respondent: Unknown

[Official PDF on Allahabad High Court website](https://elegalix.allahabadhighcourt.in/elegalix/WebDownloadOriginalHCJudgmentDocument.do?translatedJudgmentID=46409)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL U/S 372 CR.P.C. No. - 117 of 2024 Bhanwar Singh ….Appellant(s) Versus State of U.P. …..Respondents(s) Counsel for Appellant (s) : Dhiraj Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anurag Pathak, G.A., Harshit Pathak Court No. -47 HON'BLE SIDDHARTH, J. HON'BLE SANTOSH RAI, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for appellant; learned A.G.A. for State- respondents; Sri Anurag Pathak, learned counsel for respondent nos. 2 and 3 and perused the material on record. 2. This Criminal Appeal U/S 372 Cr.P.C., has been preferred praying for setting aside the judgment and order dated 20.10.2023 passed by Addl. Sessions Judge, court no.8, Saharanpur in Sessions Trial No.668 of 2012 (C.N.R. No.UPSP01003901-2016), arising out of case crime no.111 of 2012, under Sections 304 and 504 I.P.C., P.S. Rampur Maniharan, District Saharanpur whereby respondent nos.5 and 6 have been acquitted for all the offences alleged against them but another accused Raju alias Rajveer Singh has been convicted under Sections 304 and 504 I.P.C. 3. The brief facts of the case are that on 24.04.2012 the informant along with his family members was doing thresher work for threshing wh

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/august/criminal-appeal-u-s-372-cr-p-c-no-117-of-2024-at-allahabad
