# COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION vs M/S OBSSIOBN NAAZ & ORS.

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-08-22
Citation: CONT.CAS.(CRL)-3/2015 2025:DHC:7206-DB
Petitioner: COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION
Respondent: M/S OBSSIOBN NAAZ & ORS.

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/SMP22082025CRLCC32015_165652.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

$~SB-1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 22th AUGUST, 2025 IN THE MATTER OF: CONT.CAS.(CRL) 3/2015, CRL.M.A. 50201/2018, CRL.M.A. 14374/2025 COURT ON ITS OWN MOTION .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Varun Goswami, Advocate (Amicus Curiae) versus M/S OBSESSION NAAZ & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Sujeet Kumar Mishra, Mr. Pankaj Balwan, Mr. Saarthak Bansal, Advs. for Defendants No. 2 to 5, 7 to 10, 17 to 20, 23, 25 & 28 Mr. Bahar U. Barqi Advocate for R- 10, 11, 12, 13, 21 & 22. Mr. Sagar Saxena, Mr. Abhishek Singh, Mr. Karan Chaudhary & Mr. Krisnandu Haldar, Advs. for R-1, 9, 24, 27 Md. Waqar, Advocate for R-26 Ms. Sushila Narang, Advocate for R-29 & R-30 Mr. Amit Ranjan, Adv. for Samsung Electronics & Samsung India Mr. Soumya Chakraborty Senior Advocate with Ms. Nandini Sen Advocate for Kolkata Police 1. The present proceedings emanates from a mentioning made by Mr. Shravan Sahary, Advocate, who was one of the 11 Advocate Commissioners appointed by this Court vide Order dated 23.12.2014 passed by this Court in CS(OS) No.4024/2014. This Court was informed that the 11 Advocate Commissioners who had gone to Kolkata to perform the task entrusted to them by thi

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/august/court-on-its-own-motion-vs-m-s-obssiobn-naaz-ors