# TANISH ENTERPRISES THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR SMT MAMTA ARORA vs PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-04-30
Citation: CM(M)-794/2025 2025:DHC:3183
Petitioner: TANISH ENTERPRISES THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR SMT MAMTA ARORA
Respondent: PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/60930042025CMM7942025_165819.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 30th April, 2025 CM(M) 794/2025 & CM APPL. 25857-25860/2025 TANISH ENTERPRISES THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR SMT MAMTA ARORA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sushant Sagar, Ms. S. Bhatia and versus PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioner is defending a Commercial Suit which seeks recovery of Rs.12,33,557/- with interest. 2. After completion of pleading and framing of issues, both the sides led their respective evidence. 3. The plaintiff also examined its witnesses including one Mr. Saubhagya Saxena. Thereafter, the defendants also examined their witnesses and their evidence was also closed on 12.12.2024. 4. When the case was at the stage of final arguments, one application was filed by the plaintiff under Order XVI Rule 1 and under Order XVIII Rule 17 read with Section 151 CPC seeking permission to examine Ms. Durgawati Kumari. She also happens to be authorized representative of the plaintiff bank and is the one who had signed and filed the suit as such AR of the plaintiff bank. It was submitted therein that due to some inadvertent omission, she coul

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/april/tanish-enterprises-through-its-proprietor-smt-mamta-arora-vs-punjab-national-bank