# TABASSUM & ANR vs MOHD NADEEM

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-04-29
Citation: CM(M)-356/2019 2025:DHC:3156
Petitioner: TABASSUM & ANR
Respondent: MOHD NADEEM

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/60929042025CMM3562019_123104.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 29th April, 2025 CM(M) 356/2019 & CM APPL. 9378/2019 TABASSUM & ANR .....Petitioners Through: None. versus MOHD NADEEM .....Respondent Through: Mohammad Parvez, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. This is an old petition. 2. However, when the matter was taken up, there was no appearance from the side of the petitioner, albeit, learned counsel for respondent/plaintiff has joined the proceedings through video conferencing. 3. Though, all along, during the pendency of the present petition, there was no direction to the learned Trial Court to defer the proceedings, fact remains that as per learned counsel for the plaintiff, there is no headway or progress in his such suit and it is, still, at the same stage. 4. The present petition has been filed by Ms. Tabassum and Mr. Javed (defendant nos. 1 & 2 before the learned Trial Court) whose right to file written statement has been closed and by filing the present petition, they, merely, seek indulgence, to the above extent. 5. It seems that the impugned order dated 01.11.2018 was earlier challenged by them by filing a Revision Petition, which was 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/april/tabassum-anr-vs-mohd-nadeem