# SUNDEEP KUMAR VERMA vs ARCHANA SINGH

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-04-16
Citation: C.R.P.-111/2025 2025:DHC:2724
Petitioner: SUNDEEP KUMAR VERMA
Respondent: ARCHANA SINGH

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/59016042025CR1112025_193808.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 16.04.2025 C.R.P. 111/2025 SUNDEEP KUMAR VERMA .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Parisha Vishnoi, Mr. Arjun and Ms. Aashish Kumar Sagar, Advs. versus ARCHANA SINGH .....Respondent Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral) 1. The present Petition has been filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) impugning the order dated 21.01.2025 [hereinafter referred to as “Impugned Order”] passed by the learned District Judge-04, Patiala House Courts, Delhi. By the Impugned Order, the Application under Order IX Rule 9 of the CPC which was filed by the Respondent/Plaintiff seeking restoration of the suit as well as accompanying Application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 seeking condonation of delay in filing the restoration have been allowed. 2. The Respondent/Plaintiff had filed a suit for damages before the learned Trial Court. The Respondent/Plaintiff did not appear before the learned Trial Court for hearing and subsequently by an order dated 02.07.2024, the suit was dismissed in default and on account of non-appearance. 3. The Application under Order IX Rule 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/april/sundeep-kumar-verma-vs-archana-singh