# SASMITA INVESTMENTS LTD. vs APROPRIATE AUTHORITY AND 19 ORS.

Court: Bombay High Court
Date: 2025-04-25
Citation: APP/298/2014
Petitioner: SASMITA INVESTMENTS LTD.
Respondent: APROPRIATE AUTHORITY AND 19 ORS.

[Official PDF on Bombay High Court website](https://bombayhighcourt.gov.in/bhc/file/download/eyJpdiI6InhjSmVVQWFTb2JmcXNYSlFVWjJMOFE9PSIsInZhbHVlIjoiWkFGOFM0OHJ6QUdmWHBoZmkvSlhTNVR0NlkxQzY4bTgxampFaklMT0dsOERQaU8wSGJscjhWRG1xcnZ0aGhCdllDQlh4OHJtT2ljaVVuazNpN3MyMlE9PSIsIm1hYyI6IjgyNTRhYzJmZGNhMWQyNDhjN2VkMTExNzMxYzMzNzNjYWM3ZjNiZGRlYWZjOTVhMjdlZjE0MzhjYjQ2MWQ5ODQiLCJ0YWciOiIifQ==?expires=1782776421&signature=1c13ebed4e672997810db6c14673b05cfc4cb115df7723109800ef44bf5f38c4)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

app 298-14.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION APPEAL NO.298 OF 2014 IN SUIT NO.2094 OF 2006 Sasmita Investments Ltd. .. Appellant/Org. Plaintiff Versus Appropriate Authority & Ors. .. Respondents/Org. Defendants Mr. Harish Salve, Senior Counsel (through V.C.) a/w Zal Andhyarujina, Senior Counsel a/w Shanay Shah, Gunjan Mangla, Serena Jethmalani, Darshan Mehta & Aaditya Mapara i/b Dhruve Liladhar & Co. for the Appellant. Adv. R. Venkatramani, the learned Attorney General of India a/w Mr. B. M. Chatterji, Senior Advocate a/w V. Digitally Vijayalakshmi, Shreyash Shah, Udayan Mukherjee, Raman signed by UTKARSH Yadav i/b. Nivedita Mullerpattan for the Respondent Nos. 1 UTKARSH KAKASAHEB KAKASAHEB BHALERAO BHALERAO Date: and 2. 2025.04.25 20:15:16 +0530 CORAM: B. P. COLABAWALLA & FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, JJ. RESERVED ON : MARCH 13, 2025 PRONOUNCED ON : APRIL 25, 2025 APRIL 25, 2025 app 298-14.docx JUDGMENT: [ PER B. P. COLABAWALLA, J. ] 1. The above appeal takes exception to the order dated 7 th April 2014 [for short the “impugned order”] passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court. By the impugned order, the learned Single Judge dismis

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/april/sasmita-investments-ltd-vs-apropriate-authority-and-19-ors