# RAM RAGHUBIR SINGHAL vs USHA SAINI & ANR.

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-04-29
Citation: CM(M)-634/2025 2025:DHC:3154
Petitioner: RAM RAGHUBIR SINGHAL
Respondent: USHA SAINI & ANR.

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/60929042025CMM6342025_121932.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 29th April, 2025 CM(M) 634/2025 & CM APPL. 20189/2025 RAM RAGHUBIR SINGHAL .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Manu Sishodia, Advocate. versus USHA SAINI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioner is defending a suit seeking eviction, damages, mesne profit and injunction. 2. Issues were framed by the learned Trial Court on 07.12.2023. It also included following two issues:- “(i) Whether the present suit is barred by the provisions of Order II R 2 of CPC or Section 11 of CPC? (OPD) (ii) Whether the present suit is barred by limitation? (OPD)” 3. An application was moved by the defendant/petitoner before the learned Trial Court with request to treat the abovesaid issues as ‘preliminary issues’ and such request has been declined by the learned Trial Court. 4. Such order is under challenge. 5. This Court has seen the reasonings given by the learned Trial Court. It noted that, generally, such kind of issues, including issue of limitation, is a mixed question of fact and law, which can be decided only after evidence is adduced by the parties. Even with respect to the 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/april/ram-raghubir-singhal-vs-usha-saini-anr