# IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD vs SUNITA & ORS

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-04-04
Citation: MAC.APP.-905/2014 2025:DHC:3237
Petitioner: IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD
Respondent: SUNITA & ORS

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/59004042025MACA9052014_190405.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 04.04.2025 MAC.APP. 905/2014 IFFCO TOKIO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD .....Appellant Through: Ms. Khushi Sachdeva, Advocate for Mr. Pankaj Seth, Advocate. versus SUNITA & ORS .....Respondents Through: Dr. L.S. Chaudhary, Dr. Ajay Chaudhary, Mr. Vikram Singh, Mr. Bharat Chaudhary & Mr. Anirudh Sharma, Advocates for R-1 to 3 with R-1 in person. Mr. Suraj Pradhan, Advocate for R-4. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral) 1. The present Appeal has been filed on behalf of the Appellant under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 [hereinafter referred to as “MV Act”] impugning the award dated 31.07.2014 [hereinafter referred to as “Impugned Award”] passed by the learned Presiding Officer, MACT (SE- 01), Saket Courts, New Delhi. By the Impugned Order, compensation in the sum of Rs. 38,21,500/- has been awarded along with interest thereon. 2. The only challenge that is raised by the Appellant before this Court is that in computation of income, the learned Tribunal has taken into consideration the fact that there was rental income mentioned in the Income 2.1. Learned Counsel for the Appellant co

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/april/iffco-tokio-general-insurance-co-ltd-vs-sunita-ors