# FALCON LICENSING LIMITED vs PRI ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR.

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-04-15
Citation: C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM)-271/2023 2025:DHC:2592
Petitioner: FALCON LICENSING LIMITED
Respondent: PRI ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR.

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/59215042025COT2712023_091928.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM) 271/2023 & I.A. 22284/2023, I.A. 22285/2023 FALCON LICENSING LIMITED .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kunal Tandon, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Ronnie Singh, Advocate and Ms. Natasha, Advocate Mob: 8882228686 versus PRI ENTERPRISES PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Utsav Jain, Advocate for R-1. Ms. Nidhi Raman, CGSC with Mr. Arnav Mittal, Mr. Zubin Singh, Mr. Akash Mishra and Ms. Ridhi Kapoor, Advocates for R-2. Mob: 8588916612 Email: nidhiraman.office@gmail.com CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA JUDGMENT % 15.04.2025 MINI PUSHKARNA, J: 1. The present petition has been filed seeking the prayer to remove/cancel/expunge the entry pertaining to the trademark, , registered under application no. 3867168 in Class 3, from the Register of Trade Marks. 2. The facts, as canvassed in the petition, are as follows: 2.1 Petitioner is a limited company having its registered office in New Zealand. 2.2. The mark „BOLDIFY‟ was adopted by the predecessor-in-interest of the petitioner in the year 2016 for hair care products. The said mark has since been used honestly, bonafidely, continuously, openly, uninterruptedly and excl

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/april/falcon-licensing-limited-vs-pri-enterprises-private-limited-anr