# DHANPATI @ DHANWANTI vs STATE & ANR

Court: Delhi High Court
Date: 2025-04-01
Citation: CRL.M.C.-2330/2017 2025:DHC:2170
Petitioner: DHANPATI @ DHANWANTI
Respondent: STATE & ANR

[Official PDF on Delhi High Court website](https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/app/showFileJudgment/59301042025CRLMM23302017_103452.pdf)

## Judgment text (excerpt)

$~A-1 to A-3 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on: 01.04.2025 CRL.M.C. 2330/2017 DHANPATI @ DHANWANTI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. R.D. Rana and Ms. Nagina Johri, Advs. versus STATE & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manoj Taneja, Adv. for R-2 2. CRL.M.C. 2352/2017 & CRL.M.A.Nos.20235/2022 & 26924/2022 DHANPATI @ DHANPATI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. R.D. Rana and Ms. Nagina Johri, Advs. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANOTHER .....Respondents Through: Mr. Siddharth Khatana and Mr. Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, Mr. Kushagra Kumar and Mr. Abhinav Bhardwaj, Advs. for R-2 3. CRL.M.C. 2353/2017 & CRL.M.A.20487/2022 DHANPATI @ DHANWANTI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. R.D. Rana and Ms. Nagina Johri, Advs. versus STATE & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Manoj Chaudhary, Adv. for R-2 (through VC) 1. The present petitions have been filed by the petitioner Dhanpati @ Dhanwanti under Section 482 Cr.P.C. against the impugned judgment dated 24.04.2017 passed by the learned Special Judge (PC Act) (CBI)-06, New Delhi District, Patiala House Court, New Delhi, whereby three separate Revisions Petitions filed by Sushil Kumar, Rajender Singh and Dr. Kiran Jakhar were allowed and the order of 

https://niyam.ai/judgements/high-court/2025/april/dhanpati-dhanwanti-vs-state-anr